We’d love to do Vietnam top to bottom but only have so much annual leave, and the 10-day and 14-day tours are quite different in price. We’re not in a rush and would hate to feel we’d skimmed it. For people who’ve been, did 10 days feel like enough, or do you wish you’d taken the longer one?
As always, the more time you have the better.
For 3 regions, a 2 week trip will be better.
If you genuinely want to do Vietnam top to bottom, I’d hold out for the two weeks if you can. I feel like 10 days would be totally fine if you picked one or two regions, but trying to cover north, central and south would probably mean quite a few flights or overnight trains and constantly moving hotels.
1 Like
What everyone else said. I did a 10-day tour, with a few days either side which were great for exploring myself/resting/just enjoying the country. 2 weeks is deffo better, if you can stretch it 
Yeah, having a few extra days would be great. There’s so much to see, and it’s nice not having to rush from one place to the next.